HomeMy WebLinkAbout26-42 H & J Property, LLC. CR 26 Bridge Replacement 05-20-2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-42
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
FIRESTONE, COLORADO, APPROVING AGREEMENTS TO ACQUIRE
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS FROM H&J PROPERTY, LLC
AND 6856 CR 26, LLC NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE WELD
COUNTY ROAD 26 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Town of Firestone (“Town”) is constructing the Weld County Road 26
Bridge Replacement Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, to facilitate the Project, it is necessary for the Town to acquire fee title
(“Property Rights”) to two parcels of land located on both the north and south side of Weld County
Road 26 from way, which are owned by H&J Property, LLC and 6856 CR 26, LLC, respectively
(“Owners”), each as more particularly described in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, Town Staff and their right-of-way acquisition consultants for the Project have
negotiated in good faith for the acquisition of the Property Rights from the Owners, including
without limitation, establishing the just compensation to be paid for the Property Rights in
compliance with applicable law and other terms and conditions upon which the Owners will
convey the Property Rights to the Town, as more particularly described in the Memoranda of
Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibits A and B and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of Trustees (“Board”) finds and determines that the Project
enhances the public health, safety and welfare of the community by providing improved
transportation infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board further finds and determines that the timely acquisition of the
Property Rights is desirable and necessary for the completion of the Project, and is essential to protect
and preserve the health, safety, welfare and convenience of the Town’s community; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board further finds and determines there is a public need and
necessity for obtaining possession of and acquiring the Property Rights; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board desires to approve the Memoranda of Agreement, as it is in
the Town’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE TOWN OF FIRESTONE, COLORADO:
Section 1. The Town Board (a) approves the Memorandum of Agreement between the
Town of Firestone and H&J Property, LLC in substantially the same form as the copy attached
hereto as Exhibit A and made a part of this Resolution; (b) authorizes the Interim Town Manager
to execute the Memorandum of Agreement on behalf of the Town; and (c) ratifies the prior actions
of the Town Staff and their acquisition consultants in negotiating such Memorandum of Agreement
on behalf of the Town.
Section 2. The Town Board (a) approves the Memorandum of Agreement between the
Town of Firestone and 6856 CR 26, LLC in substantially the same form as the copy attached hereto
as Exhibit B and made a part of this Resolution; (b) authorizes the Interim Town Manager to
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
execute the Memorandum of Agreement on behalf of the Town; and (c) ratifies the prior actions
of the Town Staff and their acquisition consultants in negotiating such Memorandum of Agreement
on behalf of the Town.
Section 3. The Interim Town Manager, or such person’s designee, is authorized to
hereafter amend the terms, conditions or legal description of, or to clarify the nature and extent of,
the Property Rights to be acquired, and the Interim Town Manager is authorized to execute such
amendment documents to the Memoranda of Agreement to effectuate such modifications.
However, amendments to the Memoranda of Agreement that significantly impact the substance of
the transaction, such as increasing the just compensation to be paid for the Property Rights, shall
require Town Board approval.
Section 4. The Interim Town Manager is authorized to execute and deliver all
documents necessary in connection with the closing of the purchase of the Property Rights, and to
do all things necessary on behalf of the Town to perform all obligations of the Town under the
Memoranda of Agreement, including without limitation, instruments of conveyance necessary or
incidental to the acquisition of the Property Rights and the execution and delivery of all documents
necessary or required with closing.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of May 2026.
Don Conyac Jr., Mayor ATTEST:
Miriam Granados Luna, CMC, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Marshall Keith Martin, Town Attorney
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
EXHIBIT A [H&J Property LLC MOA]
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
EXHIBIT B [6856 CR 26 LLC MOA]
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
CDOT 227a
Revised 1/01
Page 1 of 2
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RECOMMENDATION FOR SETTLEMENT
REGION: 4 PARCEL NO: RW-01, TE-01
PROJECT NO: BRO M440-002 OWNER NAME: H&J Property LLC
PROJECT CODE: 26219 COUNTY: Weld
LOCATION: TRIAL DATE: None set
DOT ATTY: AG NO:
ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT – REGION LEGAL SETTLEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT – CENTRAL OFFICE OTHER SETTLEMENT
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AMOUNT
The amount of the proposed Settlement is: $ 25,000.00
The established fair market value is: $ 1,370.00
The amount of variance is: $ 23,630.00
SUPPORT DATA
Owner Appraisal $ NA Appraiser
Second Owner Appraisal (if Applicable) $ NA Appraiser
CDOT Appraisal $ NA Appraiser
Second CDOT Appraisal $ NA Appraiser
Distribution: Right of Way, Central Office – Original
Acq/Relo, Central Office
Appraisal Review, Central Office
Attorney Generals Office
Region
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
CDOT 227a
Revised 1/01
Page 2 of 2
Settlement is hereby recommended for the following reasons:
H & J Property, LLC owns a parcel of land that consists of 209.85 total acres and is currently zoned Agricultural.
Weld County seeks a total of 0.058 acres of Right-of-Way (RW-01) and 0.03 acres of temporary easement (TE-
01) from the subject property.
Western States Land Services, LLC was able to perform an in house waiver valuation that concluded a unit value
of $20,908.80/acre. The permanent easements totaled $1,221.60 and the temporary totaled $140.64 which
brought the total offer to $1,370.00.
In negotiating with H & J Property, LLC they counter offered with a value of $25,000.00.
H & J Property, LLC has signed the MOA at $25,000.00 in order to reach a voluntary settlement. Settlement of
this acquisition would allow the County to avoid the additional cost of specialty reports, litigation, attorney fees,
court costs, and expert witness fees. I believe settlement in this matter is the most prudent course of action.
The variance from the FAIR MARKET VALUE appears substantial and the proposed settlement cannot
be justified in accordance with Federal Aid Regulations. If settlement is made as proposed, $ of
the amount of VARIANCE should be taken as non-participating.
REGION APPROVAL
RECOMMEND SETTLEMENT:5/8/2026
APPROVED FOR SETTLEMENT:
I concur Town of Firestone Manager/Supervisor Date
ADDITIONAL APPROVALS (as applicable)
Recommend Settlement:
Right of Way Manager, Central Office Date
Approved for Settlement:
Chief Engineer Date
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
CDOT 227a Attachment 1
Settlement Justification Continued:
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF THE
RECOMMENDATION FOR SETTLEMENT (FORM 227A)
This form is used to provide a self explanatory narrative of all considerations that support a settlement. The relevant parcel details, the factors
considered in the settlement, and the reasoning used in arriving at the settlement amount must be clearly explained.
The extent of the written recommendation must be consistent with the situation, circumstances and the consideration involved. The
component parts of the settlement; land, improvements, real estate damages, fees and costs, etc., must be itemized to the greatest extent
possible.
Recommendations for settlement of federal aid parcels must emphasize federal participating items. The participating items to be emphasized
are the factors related to the acquisition value, real estate damages, sympathy for the owner, recent adverse awards in comparable cases and
other related factors. Less emphasis should be placed on saving appraisal and attorney fees. Any portion of he increase attributable to
nonparticipating items must be identified or estimated and handled as nonparticipating.
PROJECT/PARCEL IDENTIFICATION: The following information can be obtained from the legal documents, appraisal, Right of Way
map, and the parcel file:
TYPE OF SETTLEMENT: Identify the settlement type; Administrative Settlement, Legal Settlement, Offer of Judgment or
other settlement.
RECOMMENDED SETTLEMENT: Each component part of the settlement must be itemized to the greatest extent possible. For all
inclusive settlement, if the actual amount attributed to each component cannot be documented,
the negotiator must estimate a reasonable amount for each appropriate component based on all
available information for the parcel and known amounts for similar parcels previously settled.
SUPPORT DATA: Any appraisal documentation or claims that have been provided by the Department or the owner
must be identified in this section.
SETTLEMENT JUSTIFICATION: provide a detailed explanation of why the settlement is recommended. The settlement
justification must address specific details of the parcel and the basis of the counteroffer,
including the following criteria set forth in Section 3.13.20 of the Right of Way Manual, Chapter
3, which support the settlement as being reasonable, prudent, and in the best public interest:
• Information contained in all available appraisals reports, including those of the owner;
• Substantial differences of opinion regarding valuation issues;
• Complexity of severance or other issues leading to uncertainty in value;
• Handling of legal issues in approved appraisals;
• Consideration of time to anticipated title transfer date;
• Credibility of expert witnesses;
• Likelihood of jury sympathy for the owner;
• Possibility of obtaining an unbiased jury;
• Recent court awards for eminent domain takings;
• Potential cost of litigation; and
• Other relevant information.
If the settlement includes a non-monetary benefit, an explanation and quantification of the
benefit must be included. Fees and costs must be supported and be based on the requirements
of Section 4.4.27 of the Right of Way Manual, Chapter 4.
RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVAL: This section requires the signatures of the specialist or trial attorney recommending the
settlement, concurrence and approval by the Region Right of Way Manager, as applicable, for
settlements at the Region level. Settlements outside Region authority require recommendation
of the Right of Way Manager in the Central Office and the Chief Engineer’s approval. Approval
authority must be granted in accordance with Section 4.4.27 of the Right of Way Manual,
Chapter 4.
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Mayor
Don Jr. Conyac
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
CDOT 227a
Revised 1/01
Page 1 of 2
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RECOMMENDATION FOR SETTLEMENT
REGION: 4 PARCEL NO: RW-01, TE-01
PROJECT NO: BRO M440-002 OWNER NAME: H&J Property LLC
PROJECT CODE: 26219 COUNTY: Weld
LOCATION: TRIAL DATE: None set
DOT ATTY: AG NO:
ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT – REGION LEGAL SETTLEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT – CENTRAL OFFICE OTHER SETTLEMENT
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AMOUNT
The amount of the proposed Settlement is: $ 25,000.00
The established fair market value is: $ 1,370.00
The amount of variance is: $ 23,630.00
SUPPORT DATA
Owner Appraisal $ NA Appraiser
Second Owner Appraisal (if Applicable) $ NA Appraiser
CDOT Appraisal $ NA Appraiser
Second CDOT Appraisal $ NA Appraiser
Distribution: Right of Way, Central Office – Original
Acq/Relo, Central Office
Appraisal Review, Central Office
Attorney Generals Office
Region
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
CDOT 227a
Revised 1/01
Page 2 of 2
Settlement is hereby recommended for the following reasons:
H & J Property, LLC owns a parcel of land that consists of 209.85 total acres and is currently zoned Agricultural.
Weld County seeks a total of 0.058 acres of Right-of-Way (RW-01) and 0.03 acres of temporary easement (TE-
01) from the subject property.
Western States Land Services, LLC was able to perform an in house waiver valuation that concluded a unit value
of $20,908.80/acre. The permanent easements totaled $1,221.60 and the temporary totaled $140.64 which
brought the total offer to $1,370.00.
In negotiating with H & J Property, LLC they counter offered with a value of $25,000.00.
H & J Property, LLC has signed the MOA at $25,000.00 in order to reach a voluntary settlement. Settlement of
this acquisition would allow the County to avoid the additional cost of specialty reports, litigation, attorney fees,
court costs, and expert witness fees. I believe settlement in this matter is the most prudent course of action.
The variance from the FAIR MARKET VALUE appears substantial and the proposed settlement cannot
be justified in accordance with Federal Aid Regulations. If settlement is made as proposed, $ of
the amount of VARIANCE should be taken as non-participating.
REGION APPROVAL
RECOMMEND SETTLEMENT:5/8/2026
APPROVED FOR SETTLEMENT:
I concur Town of Firestone Manager/Supervisor Date
ADDITIONAL APPROVALS (as applicable)
Recommend Settlement:
Right of Way Manager, Central Office Date
Approved for Settlement:
Chief Engineer Date
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
CDOT 227a Attachment 1
Settlement Justification Continued:
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF THE
RECOMMENDATION FOR SETTLEMENT (FORM 227A)
This form is used to provide a self explanatory narrative of all considerations that support a settlement. The relevant parcel details, the factors
considered in the settlement, and the reasoning used in arriving at the settlement amount must be clearly explained.
The extent of the written recommendation must be consistent with the situation, circumstances and the consideration involved. The
component parts of the settlement; land, improvements, real estate damages, fees and costs, etc., must be itemized to the greatest extent
possible.
Recommendations for settlement of federal aid parcels must emphasize federal participating items. The participating items to be emphasized
are the factors related to the acquisition value, real estate damages, sympathy for the owner, recent adverse awards in comparable cases and
other related factors. Less emphasis should be placed on saving appraisal and attorney fees. Any portion of he increase attributable to
nonparticipating items must be identified or estimated and handled as nonparticipating.
PROJECT/PARCEL IDENTIFICATION: The following information can be obtained from the legal documents, appraisal, Right of Way
map, and the parcel file:
TYPE OF SETTLEMENT: Identify the settlement type; Administrative Settlement, Legal Settlement, Offer of Judgment or
other settlement.
RECOMMENDED SETTLEMENT: Each component part of the settlement must be itemized to the greatest extent possible. For all
inclusive settlement, if the actual amount attributed to each component cannot be documented,
the negotiator must estimate a reasonable amount for each appropriate component based on all
available information for the parcel and known amounts for similar parcels previously settled.
SUPPORT DATA: Any appraisal documentation or claims that have been provided by the Department or the owner
must be identified in this section.
SETTLEMENT JUSTIFICATION: provide a detailed explanation of why the settlement is recommended. The settlement
justification must address specific details of the parcel and the basis of the counteroffer,
including the following criteria set forth in Section 3.13.20 of the Right of Way Manual, Chapter
3, which support the settlement as being reasonable, prudent, and in the best public interest:
• Information contained in all available appraisals reports, including those of the owner;
• Substantial differences of opinion regarding valuation issues;
• Complexity of severance or other issues leading to uncertainty in value;
• Handling of legal issues in approved appraisals;
• Consideration of time to anticipated title transfer date;
• Credibility of expert witnesses;
• Likelihood of jury sympathy for the owner;
• Possibility of obtaining an unbiased jury;
• Recent court awards for eminent domain takings;
• Potential cost of litigation; and
• Other relevant information.
If the settlement includes a non-monetary benefit, an explanation and quantification of the
benefit must be included. Fees and costs must be supported and be based on the requirements
of Section 4.4.27 of the Right of Way Manual, Chapter 4.
RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVAL: This section requires the signatures of the specialist or trial attorney recommending the
settlement, concurrence and approval by the Region Right of Way Manager, as applicable, for
settlements at the Region level. Settlements outside Region authority require recommendation
of the Right of Way Manager in the Central Office and the Chief Engineer’s approval. Approval
authority must be granted in accordance with Section 4.4.27 of the Right of Way Manual,
Chapter 4.
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Mayor
Don Jr. Conyac
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9
Docusign Envelope ID: 5F651CEE-BB0F-89F9-8356-8DFD761ACCB9